employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

API (Accommodations Plus International)

Empresa activa

Hay potencial.: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Account Manager en API (Accommodations Plus International)

3,0
21 mar 2025
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Miembros del equipo serviciales en todos los departamentos (es decir, ayudan con la capacitación). Empresa tecnológica con potencial. Trabajo remoto/híbrido. Buena experiencia para tu currículum. Beneficios de vacaciones/vacaciones. Microgestión limitada.

Desventajas

Hay cuentas buenas y cuentas malas (si te toca una mala cuenta, puede que tu gerente no entienda, o no le importe, la carga de trabajo y te agotarás debido a la falta de equilibrio entre el trabajo y la vida personal). Dirán que no trabajas los fines de semana, pero definitivamente trabajarás los fines de semana. La capacitación es básicamente aprender sobre la marcha. El proceso contable es malo, lo que causa muchas facturas impagas: tendrás que solucionar problemas a menudo, así como tratar con muchos proveedores insatisfechos. Dependiendo de tu gerente, podrías tener un apoyo gerencial muy mínimo y posiblemente un gerente que sea reactivo en lugar de proactivo. Dependiendo de tu gerente, podrías tener al gerente que se enfurece y te menosprecia frente a tus colegas y clientes. Dependiendo de tu cuenta, podrías experimentar cambios constantes en los procesos. Para una empresa de tecnología, encontrarás que hay muchas hojas de cálculo de Excel utilizadas para una variedad de seguimiento en lugar de usar plataformas técnicas que podrían ser más eficientes.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre API (Accommodations Plus International).

5,0
6 ago 2025
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Bajo estrés, buen lugar para trabajar.

Desventajas

Nada por mi parte. Gracias.

2,0
13 ene 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Authentic Executive Leadership: The CEO and executive team are incredibly approachable and visible. They frequently walk around the office with warm smiles and friendly greetings. Several executive leaders have even held elevator doors open for me or helped carry items when my hands were full. Their presence feels authentic and caring, which creates a welcoming, "family" type atmosphere. High Internal Trust: There is a strong sense of mutual respect among the employees. The environment is remarkably trustworthy; I never hesitated to leave electronics or personal items on my desk, as the culture is one where people truly look out for one another. Strong Onsite Amenities: While working from home is the preference for many, the onsite experience here is high-quality. The building is modern and well-maintained, and the office itself is clean and relatively quiet for a productive workspace. Additionally, the parking is excellent and very convenient. True Diversity: I really appreciated how diverse the staff is. You see people from all walks of life and all ages, from Gen Z starting their careers to Boomers with years of experience. It was also great to see so many women in leadership roles across the building. Talented Peer Group: Many of the newer leaders and managers are impressive; they bring fresh ideas, kindness, and a collaborative spirit. The majority of the company is supportive, intelligent, and helpful. Numerous employees are genuinely talented, take their work seriously, and make excellent colleagues. Hospitality & Breakfast Perks: The company provides a great variety of food and beverages. There is a weekly Health & Wellness Day with a large selection of fruit and a Bagel Day with fresh bagels provided for breakfast. There is also a large assortment of coffees, teas, and hot chocolate, including an onsite cold brew machine. Furthermore, generous clients frequently provide delicious catered food. This constant abundance is a significant benefit and a definite cost savings. Product Potential: The company has a strong product offering and many talented individual contributors who are dedicated to their work.

Desventajas

Departmental Silos & Fragmented Culture: Like many growing organizations, there is a significant disconnect between teams. My perspective is based specifically on the HR department, where we faced unique cultural hurdles. Beyond the lack of cross-functional cohesion, there was a palpable "in-group/out-group" dynamic. Certain team members were systematically isolated; if you weren’t part of the lead's inner circle, you were excluded from key discussions, leaving you feeling alienated and confused. This "in or out" mentality made it very difficult to feel like a unified team. The Internal Tech Paradox: For a technical company, the internal operations are surprisingly antiquated. The reliance on fragmented, manual spreadsheets for data management is a major drain on productivity. Even when the company invests in premium platforms like a high-end ATS, the tools are so underutilized that it feels like "owning a Ferrari but never shifting out of first gear." For an organization that prides itself on being "lean," this dependence on repetitive manual entry forces talented staff to focus on "busy work" rather than high-value strategy. Undermined Autonomy & Redundant Micromanagement: My experience was both confusing and demoralizing. While I was verbally promised the freedom to lead my function, the reality was a level of micromanagement that led to operational redundancies. Despite having much larger strategic priorities, my manager would frequently redo tasks I had already completed. This created significant confusion for new hires—for instance, when a manager would send duplicate onboarding emails containing errors after a polished version had already been sent. This constant over-involvement disrupted our professional rhythm and was ultimately damaging to the company’s brand and the new hire experience. Lack of Functional Authority for HR: There is a noticeable lack of respect for HR as a professional discipline. Managers from other departments frequently overstepped their bounds to dictate HR processes—interference that would never be tolerated in Finance or Engineering. Unfortunately, HR leadership often capitulated to these outside demands rather than setting firm boundaries, making it difficult for the team to operate as subject-matter experts. Preference Over Performance: Within my team, being a "favorite" often seemed to carry more weight than the quality of one's work. Preferential treatment was frequently given to a select few, while others had their ideas dismissed. It is difficult to maintain morale when professional settings are marked by visible disdain, such as eye-rolling in meetings, or when leadership engages in gossip about team members. Emotional Volatility & Professionalism: The daily environment was often unpredictable due to the emotional volatility of leadership. The "energy" on the team shifted constantly; some days were productive, while others were defined by a "crabby" or unprofessional attitude. This inconsistency forced certain team members to "walk on eggshells," making it impossible to establish a stable professional baseline. Conflicts of Interest in Hiring: I experienced significant pressure to prioritize a family member of my manager for an open role. This included being messaged as late as 10:30 PM to coordinate interviews for the following morning. This level of nepotism felt highly unfair to merit-based candidates and created a clear conflict of interest that distracted from business-critical deadlines. The "Inner Circle" Dynamic: There is a palpable divide between the "old guard" and new talent. Those not in the inner circle often found themselves frozen out of essential conversations or given the "cold shoulder" treatment, which stifled genuine collaboration and made it difficult for new voices to contribute effectively. A Difficult Exit: My final impression was soured by a lack of empathy during the offboarding process. I was asked to drive 45 minutes on a day I usually worked from home just for a short meeting that easily could have been done virtually. It felt like my time and effort weren't valued at the end.

2
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo