Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empresas

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      SDG Group

      Empresa activa

      Información
      Opiniones
      Sueldos y beneficios
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Opiniones sobre SDG Group | Ofertas de empleos en SDG Group | Sueldos en SDG Group | Beneficios en SDG Group
      Entrevistas de SDG GroupEntrevistas para el puesto de AI Engineer en SDG GroupEntrevista de SDG Group


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empresas

      • Cuenta gratuita de empresa
      • Centro de empresas

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Normas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de consentimiento de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Empleo
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. «Glassdoor», «Worklife Pro», «Bowls» y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información de primera mano.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista de AI Engineer

      25 mar 2026
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Madrid
      Sin oferta
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista normal

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en SDG Group (Madrid)

      Entrevista

      My experience with this process was frankly very poor. The technical assignment required a significant amount of dedication, many hours of real work, and a high level of commitment from the candidate. However, the interview that followed was not at the level of either the effort requested or the seniority of the role. I was not upset about not being selected; what I found disappointing was the way the work I had delivered was evaluated. The overall impression I took away was one of complete lack of focus, limited preparation, and very little regard for the time invested. Instead of assessing the work with clear criteria, the interview drifted, focused on secondary points, and did not leave real space to present or explain everything that had been built. In a project with several moving parts, saying “let’s look at the code” without a clear structure or well-directed questions is not a serious evaluation; it is simply a disorganized way of putting the candidate in a very uncomfortable position. The worst part was the way the interview itself was conducted. Having one of the interviewers leave in the middle of the meeting conveyed disinterest, poor planning, and a real lack of consideration toward someone who had used part of their personal time to prepare the assignment. If commitment is expected from the candidate, the minimum expectation is that the evaluation team shows that same level of commitment. In addition, the tone at times felt condescending. You cannot claim to be hiring for a senior profile and then treat the candidate as if they had to justify every single decision without there even being a clear evaluation framework. Some comments seemed more aimed at downplaying the work that had been done than at genuinely understanding it. The final impression was not just one of poor organization, but of a process that at certain points felt quite humiliating. In short: a high level of demand placed on the candidate, very little consistency in the evaluation, and a technical interview that was poorly focused and not in line with the level they were supposedly looking for.