Envié una solicitud electrónica. El proceso duró 4 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Epic en abr 2015
Entrevista
first a phone interview asking why i prefer epic etc. This is followed by an online assessment which has four parts - quick answer session, new language, logical section and a programming section. The assessment is hosted by a 3rd party(proctorU). Someone will proctor the entire exam. You can take a break of maximum 10 mins.
Preguntas de entrevista [3]
Pregunta 1
The programming questions
1. a leap year related problem. Given a mm/dd/yyyy format, you have to tell whether it is a correct date or not. Also you have to find the next leap year date.
3. Suppose you are playing chess with another person. Suddenly, one of your soldiers are misplaced and none of you remember its actual location. Your opponent gives you an opportunity to place it in an empty space in the chessboard wherever you want. Find the location where you should place your soldier so that you can remove maximum number of opponents' soldier.
Acudí a una entrevista en Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entrevista
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.
