Advice for management: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Senior UX Analyst en Infor

2,0
27 ene 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Many product directors had strong vision for a thoughtful future amongst an ever present dominant engineering team culture. Lots of room for UX growth. Scalable and complex work. You can do well here if you’re patient, politically savvy and do your best to execute in a way that aligns with leadership.

Desventajas

Direct manager was absent until 6 months into the job making day-to-day work difficult and understanding company priorities extremely hard. Products rely heavily on legacy systems that need a major overhaul and make it extremely hard to make even the smallest of changes. Bad attitudes are protected. Even seasoned UX designers, UX input can be disregarded when asked to join and deliver too late in the stage of development or through incorrect channels. (Several times placed on projects that were scoped incorrectly)

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Infor.

5,0
27 may 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Desventajas

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Respuesta de Infor
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3,0
22 may 2026
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Desventajas

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Respuesta de Infor
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo