Awful CEO and place to work: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Empleado anónimo en Ark Workplace Risk

1,0
27 oct 2022
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Nothing to recommend this business

Desventajas

Awful, overbearing CEO. A constant stream of employee turnover, including Directors that are highly experienced and extremely capable due to the overbearing nature of the CEO. Avoid this place at all costs.

avatar
Respuesta de Ark Workplace Risk
3y
Thank you for the review. What comes to mind is gender biased by choosing "overbearing" the opposite word of submissive. It’s a tricky one describing female leaders especially in a social media post as "overbearing" and stating this as a reason to avoid this company is a little disappointing. We believe women here can be strong willed, determined and straightforward. At Ark we discourage gender biases as we believe our female leaders can make successful careers at Ark, because they feel comfortable being authentic, and if that means displaying qualities associated with their male leaders, then that’s very acceptable here at Ark too. Our ethos is not who you are, but what you are about. We suspect a company like ours is a refreshing difference to the industry we specialise in, and is one of our USPs. According to Forbes - in the workforce, it is well established that women must contend with a host of biases that make the climb up an organizational ladder steeper and more arduous. For instance, when women act with equal assertiveness to men, they are perceived as being too bossy. Likewise, ambition and competitiveness are negatively correlated with like-ability for women whereas the opposite is true for men (as was evidenced in the famous Heidi/Howard experiment).  Ark are deeply passionate about tackling gender biases and creating the environment for women to have the same free from biases.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Ark Workplace Risk.

1,0
29 may 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

I would strongly caution anyone considering joining this company. Based on my experience, the company has a serious leadership and culture problem. The management style I observed was authoritarian, aggressive, and often dismissive of employees. Rather than building people up, encouraging professional growth, or creating a constructive working environment, the culture appeared to rely on fear, criticism, and control. The CEO’s leadership style was, in my view, a major concern. I experienced and observed communication that felt intimidating and unprofessional, including situations where people were criticised or embarrassed in front of others. Independent thinking did not seem to be welcomed, and employees appeared reluctant to speak honestly because of how they might be treated. I also found the business leadership itself to be poor. For a company that claims significant experience, I was surprised by what I saw as weak management practice, limited commercial judgement, and a lack of modern people-leadership skills. This was one of the most negative workplace cultures I have encountered in my career. In my opinion, the company needs serious change at leadership level before it can be considered a healthy or professional place to work, the CEO needs to be replaced as well. Prospective employees should ask careful questions about management style, staff turnover, internal culture, and how disagreement is handled before accepting any role here.

Desventajas

Unfortunately, none, I wish I could have at least one

2,0
1 feb 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

The consultant cohort is also largely made up of good people who are willing to help each other out when workloads spike. There is a strong sense of camaraderie at consultant level. The Operations team are genuinely excellent—supportive, responsive, and clearly trying to keep things running smoothly even though they are being faced with the predicament of booking visits for consultants struggling with poor work-life balance.

Desventajas

The current senior leadership decision-making is inconsistent, which has had a noticeable impact on workload management and work-life balance for consultants. Difficult decisions are often delayed or avoided, and this creates ongoing pressure further down the business, specifically for consultants, who feel that the Ark board's main priority is making profit at the expense of burnt out consultant's well-being. While leadership presence in team meetings can appear positive on the surface, this hasn’t translated into meaningful change in day-to-day realities for consultants. Over the past several months, the direction of the business has felt increasingly uncertain, and morale has declined as a result. There was a period not long ago when it felt like the company was moving in the right direction, but momentum has stalled and, in some areas, reversed. I was promised when I joined that Ark lives by it's promoted values, however, I currently feel like I've made a mistake in joining Ark. I just hope that there is a change made soon to improve consultants' work-life balance.

1
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo