Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empresas

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Target

      Empresa activa

      Información
      Opiniones
      Sueldos y beneficios
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Opiniones sobre Target | Ofertas de empleos en Target | Sueldos en Target | Beneficios en Target
      Entrevistas de TargetEntrevistas para el puesto de Operations Research Analyst en TargetEntrevista de Target


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empresas

      • Cuenta gratuita de empresa
      • Centro de empresas

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Normas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de consentimiento de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Empleo
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. «Glassdoor», «Worklife Pro», «Bowls» y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información de primera mano.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Las mejores empresas en cuanto a «Remuneración y beneficios» cerca de ti

      avatar
      Costco Wholesale
      4.2★Remuneración y beneficios

      Entrevista de Operations Research Analyst

      10 ago 2020
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Minneapolis, MN
      Sin oferta
      Experiencia negativa

      Solicitud

      Solicité el puesto a través de un captador. El proceso duró 4 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Target (Minneapolis, MN) en jul 2020

      Entrevista

      After the recruiter emailed me if I'm interested in the role, we had a short call. He explained the location is in Minneapolis and gave some overview of the team. Fast forward to the screening call, two individuals called and ask me some generic technical questions. Then they scheduled four sessions for the interviews: Round 1) I met with a analyst from the team and he asked the SQL query question. He was clearly copy/pasting and reading off leetcode because he not properly explaining the question. Then he asked some overall questions about duality theorem but was not taking note on my performance. Round 2) I met with a manager who was supervising the role. We had some generic chat about supply chain but nothing technical. Round 3) I met with another manager, and we went over my resume. Again nothing technical, I felt they just want to get a sense of your personality at that point. Round 4) I met with another manager but this round was interesting. He joined the call about 5 minutes late. Then he started to brag about his managerial experience and how he identified the need to form a group of world-class operations researchers there. Then he bragged about Target being a fortune 50 companies. Then he threatened that if you're looking for an easy going job where you get off at 5 pm this is not for you. The whole conversation had a negative tone which I did not like. After the interview sessions I knew that is not a healthy environment to work. So I was not following up with the recruiter but during the three weeks after, he was sending me emails that we are interviewing more people and you're among the top candidates. Eventually, he called and let me know the team chose someone with more industry experience.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Write a SQL query to rank scores. If there is a tie between two scores, both should have the same ranking. Note that after a tie, the next ranking number should be the next consecutive integer value. In other words, there should be no "holes" between ranks. +----+-------+ | Id | Score | +----+-------+ | 1 | 3.50 | | 2 | 3.65 | | 3 | 4.00 | | 4 | 3.85 | | 5 | 4.00 | | 6 | 3.65 | +----+-------+ For example, given the above Scores table, your query should generate the following report (order by highest score): +-------+---------+ | score | Rank | +-------+---------+ | 4.00 | 1 | | 4.00 | 1 | | 3.85 | 2 | | 3.65 | 3 | | 3.65 | 3 | | 3.50 | 4 | +-------+---------+
      Responder pregunta