Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empresas

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Synapse Product Development

      Parte de Capgemini Invent

      ¿Esta es tu empresa?

      Información
      Opiniones
      Sueldos y beneficios
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Opiniones sobre Synapse Product Development | Ofertas de empleos en Synapse Product Development | Sueldos en Synapse Product Development | Beneficios en Synapse Product Development
      Entrevistas de Synapse Product DevelopmentEntrevistas para el puesto de Senior Embedded/Firmware Software Engineer en Synapse Product DevelopmentEntrevista de Synapse Product Development


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empresas

      • Cuenta gratuita de empresa
      • Centro de empresas

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Normas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de consentimiento de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Empleo
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. «Glassdoor», «Worklife Pro», «Bowls» y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información de primera mano.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista de Senior Embedded/Firmware Software Engineer

      26 nov 2014
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Seattle, WA
      Sin oferta
      Entrevista normal

      Solicitud

      Envié una solicitud electrónica. El proceso duró 3 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en Synapse Product Development (Seattle, WA) en nov 2014

      Entrevista

      I wanted to write about this one because they have some decent artistry to the hiring process and look like they are pretty collaborative -- hence, a good place to learn. They have a simple coding exercise to do along with the application. The subsequent phone screen involved discussion of C++, RTOSes and how they work, mutexes, and Synapse culture. The inevitable coding question on collabedit.com was a simple one in C about linked lists, then discussion afterwards. All of this was a fun discussion and the interviewer answered many questions I had, including the general kind of projects he works on. I went in for the full-loop, which consisted of three phases, one with a senior engineer at or near management level and in any case with long experience in computing. The interview involved about one third discussion of my work and projects, a third coding on the whiteboard, with a basic data structures question, then adding a requirement beyond the basics to see how I'd handle that, and then the final third addressing my concerns about their recent layoff rounds and balance of working independently and working together. The second overall phase was technical discussion with two engineers about a range of topics including testing, memory management, and general environments they address in their work. Finally the third round consisted of structurally non-technical discussion with three engineers (not strictly software engineers); basically, let's shoot the breeze and see if we can get along and let's see how the candidate thinks and presents himself. I very much liked that they had a large component of the process devoted to figuring out whether the candidate is a good fit for their team in the more "intangible" aspects. Overall, I enjoyed the Synapse interview process, and I would guess that their process yields a large pool of qualified final candidates from which they pick in the end (rather than a very small pool of extremely nitpicked candidates). I liked that they didn't seem fixated on any particular technology. That being said, it's possible that I didn't impress them enough with Cortex M experience -- as the interviews went well from my perspective, perhaps something else beyond my perception wasn't a good fit or they just had a pretty sweet pool to pick from. The whole process was 3.5 weeks from application to "no".

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      There's not a particular question that's most difficult. I'd recommend being pretty up on RTOS and recent embedded microcontrollers. In my case I feel I am rather up on C, C++, board design and bringup, hw tools, author-level linker and debugger tech, fair RTOS understanding at a kernel level, register-level ARM and AVR understanding, and decades of UNIX experience, and those didn't get me to "yes", despite all those fitting the job description. So you might wish to set expectations that a whole constellation of judgement may be at play and a good technical show may be just half of the requirements. I really don't know why I wasn't selected, unfortunately, so my guess is in a market like SF or Seattle one gets a pretty sweet pool from which to choose.
      Responder pregunta
      5

      Las mejores empresas en cuanto a «Remuneración y beneficios» cerca de ti

      avatar
      Hyundai Engineering and Construction
      3.6★Remuneración y beneficios
      avatar
      Fluor
      3.9★Remuneración y beneficios
      avatar
      Orascom Construction
      3.6★Remuneración y beneficios