Four rounds of interviews over three weeks for a role that was actually a backfill, not a new position as originally presented. The urgency to fill the seat was apparent throughout the process, yet they still passed after putting candidates through an excessive number of rounds. Each interview was with a different internal stakeholder who was not the final decision maker, which could have easily been consolidated into a panel or meet the team format instead of separate rounds. When asked about company culture and the recent CEO transition, the response was essentially that it did not affect them personally, which came across as dismissive and not reassuring for someone evaluating whether to join. There were also active internal platform issues the team openly discussed during interviews, raising questions about how ready they actually were to bring someone on. On top of that, the expectation is to travel to Tennessee for onboarding and to receive equipment, which was not made clear upfront. Recruiter communication was inconsistent throughout. If you value your time, just know the process does not match the effort they expect from candidates.