Two sessions First was a simple programming problem (around calculating n-size average in an array), a class design problem (constructing a filter object) and a logical problem (divers - both this and the latter have been mentioned in other reviews) Second was a similar design problem and logical problem, plus some more general behavioural questions. Interviewers were nice people, I didn't find the process too difficult/stressful and feedback was very swift / detailed. I was made and ultimately turned down an offer for personal reasons (i.e. not worth going into here, but not driven by interactions with the business).

The interview process was well-structured and efficient. They outlined clearly on their invitation what the interview would entail, who would be joining and how long it would last, which I appreciated as it did not feel like they were trying to catch me off-guard like other companies I interviewed with. It consisted of three stages, two technical interviews and a behavioural one. I found their way of evaluating a candidate's technical abilities very smart. Their questions were challenging but they were aligned with the day-to-day responsibilities of a software engineer. They were focused on how a candidate approaches a problem and not if they remember the syntax of a particular language. Overall, everyone I interacted with left a positive impression on me, and the company's clear communication and friendly approach to the interview process further reinforced my belief that this would be a great place to work. Despite having another offer, I felt confident that this company was the right fit for me.