Short take home test to peer review code Live coding exercise with 2 engineers They wanted to video record interviews for additional training purposes and for their records. Personally felt bit unnecessary - this adds more pressure to the candidate + other privacy concerns

Overall the interviewing process is very relaxed, the persons involved are very helpful and engage in the interview. After the a HR review of my CV I was contacted for an initial HR screening and to discuss the role in more detail, and also my experience and how it is relevant to the potential role. At the end of the call a piece of code was sent to me and I was expected to perform a code review within a week or so. Write comments and suggestions. After passing this stage, a technical interview was setup where I was expected to code live with a web camera and screen sharing with a senior engineer. This lasts approximately 1 hr. A small piece of code / requirements are given to you and you have to outline how you plan to solve the problem and implement the relevant code, tests included. Be prepared to answer some follow up questions. Following this interview, a followup interview was arranged with a team lead, this more of a formal interview. I was asked to discuss my previous experience. Competency questions. The role is discussed more and was a good opportunity to ask about the role and company in general. Lasts about 1 hr Team lead identified that I would be suitable for a slightly different role with specific team, another interview was arranged with a new team, very similar format to the previous. Overall great process and people, recruiter even took time to catch up and follow up every step and take feedback. Great HR team.