Went through several rounds of interviews, including a mock presentation that required significant prep, only to receive vague feedback citing "shifting priorities" after directors departed. The materials provided were inconsistent and error-prone, and expectations seemed misaligned for someone coming in externally. The compensation structure is unclear—a 70/30 split with back-end-loaded compensation—and they expect full-time in-office work. The team evaluating candidates appears to be long-tenured but lacks up-to-date technical depth, still operating heavily in Excel. Ultimately, it felt like the hiring process may serve other internal motives (like posturing for a sale) more than it does actual growth. I would not recommend pursuing this opportunity unless you're desperate for a role and don't mind outdated systems, a lack of clarity, and poor candidate communication.