Envié una solicitud electrónica. El proceso duró 6 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en PLOS (Londres, Inglaterra) en feb 2021
Entrevista
The interview was for an Associate/Senior Editor at PLOS Medicine. The process was excellent and everyone involved was lovely. First there was a video call with the HR people, followed by a task involving reviewing two articles, then a technical interview lasting approximately 1 hour mostly discussing the articles from the task and publishing in general. The technical interview, while difficult (for me anyway!) had a discussion feel and the interviewers definitely tried to focus on the areas they thought they could get good responses from me as opposed to pushing for answers I didn't seem to know, which I much appreciated. The final round was apparently a more general skills interview (but I didn't get that far). The interviewers were exceptionally nice and offered to provide feedback.
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
They asked a lot of questions regarding randomisation in clinical trials.
Some questions about open peer review, open access, data availability, pre-publication peer review.
Solicité el puesto por otro medio. El proceso duró 2 semanas. Acudí a una entrevista en PLOS (Birmingham, Inglaterra) en ago 2025
Entrevista
they sent me an email with a link to decide a day and time for the interview. The interview was with one person only. It was a half an hour online interview. The position they were offering was a remote/online position from anywhere in the UK
Envié una solicitud electrónica. El proceso duró 3 meses. Acudí a una entrevista en PLOS
Entrevista
Interview with HR, general competency questions - 30 min;
Assignment - was given 2 hours to assess submitted manuscripts;
Second interview - 1 hour 15 mins with a team of two.
Phone call screening interview with the recruiter/HR rep. It was very casual and lasted 15 minutes. Mostly just introductions and overview of the interviewing process. Wanted to know what I know about PLOS. Described the role.
