Applied online, the process was about 3 weeks. 1st interview was with 2 HR that lasted about 45 minutes including a psychometric test. 2nd interview was with the scientists that lasted about 40 minutes. HR arranges the interview through Whatsapp, then emails the Microsoft Teams/Google meet invite. If you made it to 2nd round, HR will text about a week later to arrange the interviews. 1st interview was split into three parts. In the first part, questions asked were the typical interview questions. When I have not finished answering a question, I told by the HR that they had to move on to the next segment, possibly due to time constraints. Personally I feel that if a question is asked, an answer by the interviewee should be given before going on to the next segment; it seems like they were asking for the "sake of asking" without wanting to know the interviewee better. The 2nd segment asked questions relating to my experience with lab and personality questions. Some questions were rather odd, not sure what is the significance of asking them. 3rd segment was the timed psychometric test. For the entire duration, HR did not on the camera at all, so I was talking to a Microsoft Teams screen instead. Leaning towards neutral experience with the HR. 2nd interview with the scientists asked about my experience with lab (again), career goals, how I found out about the company etc. Some questions were repeated from the HR interview. Generally positive experience with the scientists. Was ghosted for 1+ week after the 2nd interview, had to email HR to check for outcome. Just my two cents: don't ghost applicants who have made it to the interview stage of the interview, even if it's the norm to ghost, common practice is not always the best/good practice. It isn't very nice to waste potential applicants' time when we could use the time to pursue other opportunities. Overall, neutral interview experience.