I was under the impression by the employee reviews and first interview that this was a professional, decent, stable company to work for potentially. Unfortunately, this does not appear to be the case. If you want to give it a shot, I would advise weighing EVERYTHING carefully with this company. Be sure you look at how they responded to the one star reviews under benefits (they repeatedly put some "spam notice" that they are working with Glassdoor to rectify spammy reviews…. and are still up from at least 3 years ago….) And seriously consider all the negative interview reviews here and rightfully so. My experience: the position I applied to had an initial 30 minute interview covering my past experiences, what I've worked on in the past, basically a timeline. At the end of the interview the manager told me the interview process was 3 steps. They will tell you that the interview is a three-step process with a mock presentation at the end. They will state the salary range and ask your salary requirements. Ok, that's normal. The second interview is where you'll meet more execs of the company. Evaluate them carefully, and ask questions tactfully. They come across as meaningful, good-intended, thoughtful people, who emphasize how much they care about the people they hire and how they invest in their personal development. I can confirm that they did make rude remarks to me also about leaving my previous job -- trying to pass it off as a joke. They also made erroneous comments about my personality. At the very end, I felt more annoyed and confused why they decided to downplay how long I've been working--condescendingly saying "I know you've had a short career..." Wait, four years as a freelancer before transitioning into five years in house is a short career to you? They decided to say that at the end of a 2 hour second interview. Of course, they were proud to tout their 30 years of experience and low turnover and how they didn’t want someone to take the position to quit 3 years later at any chance they could get. Ok some of that is fair but things crossed the line/changed for the worse when they sent me on for a third interview. The mock presentation they said would be the third interview actually turned into a homework assignment that would easily be over 3 hours. They also wanted a separate meeting to negotiate salary and Q&A for the assignment. The assignment was to be a full strategy auditing one of their CURRENT clients (later they denied this was their client, however their copyright was in the footer) and 7 Instagram and LinkedIn additional posts for them with a full content calender delivered to them prior to the date of presentation. Interesting that a company in the industry for well over 30 years can't evaluate skills on a portfolio an needs to request a working interview for free. Many red flags after I declined and offered to go over samples of my portfolio, including verbiage such as "there are many who are willing to EARN the opportunity" and "it would only take 3-4 hours" ... check the reviews here- why was this exact position open in 2019 (it’s 2023 now) and why you are admitting you are not paying for 3-4 hours worth of work? They tried to explain that since they are deriving no value from it, they don't need to pay. I wonder if they refuse to pay their employees when they don't use their work. I don't know who is writing their Glassdoor reviews but I don't think I need to stay more. Any true self respecting professional in the field needs no other warning here. RUN.