Interview process was disjointed as the recruiter left midway through the process. Once picked back up, things went relatively smoothly. I thought my interviews went quite well, but did not get an offer and did not receive feedback despite asking.

There are 5 rounds in total. Round 1: 30 min HR screen Round 2 : 30 min with an engineering manager Round 3: 30 min with a group PM *Between round 3 and 4, you get a take-home assignment which is a case question. You are supposed to send in your write up 48 hrs before the next step, which is an onsite. Round 4 - 75 minutes onsite, which includes 20 min case presentation, 10 minutes Q&A and 45 minutes of a "workshop" where you are supposed to come up with a MVP on the spot. Note that the people on this round were people you've never met in your earlier rounds. Round 5 - VP of product. The interview process was extremely disorganized and strange, because there is nowhere in the process where they tell you which product role or which product team you are being interviewed for. When I asked this question over and over again, they kept telling me "it doesn't matter" because it's a "shared pipeline". I invested a lot of time and energy and clear all the rounds, was invited onsite, given an office tour, and received a standard rejection message 3 days later. The rejection letter didn't even spell out which role I was interviewing for - that space where the role was literally said "TEMPLATE". Imagine how they would treat me if I actually got the job - will I be laid off from a "template" role too? For a company that does HR software, this is almost comical.