The interview process included a 1-hour timed assessment with 5 math questions and 1 coding challenge. The time limit was extremely tight, making it difficult to thoughtfully solve the problems. It felt more like a test of speed under pressure than an evaluation of actual problem-solving ability, especially for a senior-level role. The process could benefit from either extending the time or reducing the complexity to allow candidates to showcase their skills effectively.

Slow interview process and inept management team. Finished open ended OA coding exam based on OOPs principles. I enjoyed talking to Shri and Glen who were very knowledgeable and very nice to talk to. I was asked very good c++ questions on modern c++ features. Was asked to implement std optional like container and was asked one string algorithm question. My latter two interviews were very disappointing. One was a Russian guy who didn't want to be there and I could tell right from the beginning he didn't want me there. Second was a guy called Anthony who asked me how I solved a specific technical problem at work. He said he likes what he saw and gave me a positive signal but then came rejection. I have no idea what the rejection could even be on. It was a complete waste of time. HR didn't even give me any feedback.