Solicité el puesto a través de un captador. El proceso duró 1 semana. Acudí a una entrevista en IXL Learning (San Francisco, CA)
Entrevista
Recruiter call and then HM call, it was an easy behavior round but felt like I messed this. The next round would have been take home assignment, panel presentation and then 4 on-site rounds
Preguntas de entrevista [1]
Pregunta 1
Tell me about a data you had to work with no data Tell me about a 0 ->1 project What were some of the challenges you faced then Tell me about a difficult stakeholder you worked with Also a small 5 mins assignment where they ask you to give design opinion between 6 landing pages
A bit rushed; didn't give feedback which is always annoying; felt a bit random with how they rejected, but didn't get the logic puzzle so that could be why; format was a behavioral question, how to improve the website, logic puzzle
Solicité el puesto a través de un captador. Acudí a una entrevista en IXL Learning
Entrevista
Interview was pretty standard, but they completely ghosted me after the second round. Its fine if you are rejecting me, but I find it unprofessional and a bad candidate experience to not hear back whatsoever.
Solicité el puesto a través de la recomendación de un empleado. El proceso duró 2 meses. Acudí a una entrevista en IXL Learning (San Francisco, CA) en ago 2025
Entrevista
The process was unnecessarily long and utterly disorganized. I applied for a Product Manager role but was unexpectedly down-leveled to an Associate PM position without explanation. The recruiter took two to three weeks to respond between each step, which made the entire process drag on for over a month.
The first round was a conversational interview with PM, followed by a lengthy take-home assignment that required deep product analysis and writing. After submitting thoughtful, detailed work, I received a generic rejection email with no feedback.
For a company focused on learning and improvement, the lack of transparency, feedback, and respect for candidate time was disappointing. The process felt more like a test of endurance than a genuine evaluation of product thinking. A great mission doesn’t excuse a poor interview experience.
