Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empresas

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Hopper

      ¿Esta es tu empresa?

      Información
      Opiniones
      Sueldos y beneficios
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Opiniones sobre Hopper | Ofertas de empleos en Hopper | Sueldos en Hopper | Beneficios en Hopper
      Entrevistas de HopperEntrevistas para el puesto de Software Engineer en HopperEntrevista de Hopper


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empresas

      • Cuenta gratuita de empresa
      • Centro de empresas

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Normas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de consentimiento de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Empleo
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. «Glassdoor», «Worklife Pro», «Bowls» y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información de primera mano.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista de Software Engineer

      24 abr 2021
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      New York, NY
      Sin oferta
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista difícil

      Solicitud

      Envié una solicitud electrónica. Acudí a una entrevista en Hopper (New York, NY) en abr 2021

      Entrevista

      First Online Assessment for 2 hours in HackerRank. Then a live coding interview session. Then 3 hours back to back interview with the panel which including another round of coding interview.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Below is sample chat to flight booking: Hopper: Hello, John! It looks like you booked a Basic Economy flight. Hopper: Are you aware that this flight doesn't have any storage for carry-on luggage? > User is given the options [Yes] and [No] User: No Hopper: Some other limitations you may want to consider is that you will not be able to pick a seat. Hopper: We're happy to let you know that we can upgrade you today for just $25! Hopper: Would you like to do that now? > User is given the options [Yes, please upgrade] and [Not right now] User: Not right now Conclusion: Okay, please let our customer service team know if you change your mind. This conversation can take place in a different way based on user input. Deliver the entire conversation as a decision tree when the user enters the conversation interface. This particular conversation can be represented as follows (where each four spaces represents one indentation level): Output(text="Hello, John! It looks like you booked a Basic Economy flight.") Output(text="Are you aware that this flight doesn't have any storage for carry-on luggage?") - Answer(text="No") Output(text="Some other limitations you may want to consider is that you will not be able to pick a seat.") Output(text="We're happy to let you know that we can upgrade you today for just $25!") Output(text="Would you like to do that now?") - Answer(text="Not right now") Conclusion(text="Okay, please let our customer service team know if you change your mind.") - Answer(text="Yes, please upgrade") Conclusion(text="Okay, you've been upgraded!") - Answer(text="Yes") Output(text="We're happy to let you know that we can upgrade you today for just $25!") Output(text="Would you like to do that now?") - Answer(text="Not right now") Conclusion(text="Okay, please let our customer service team know if you change your mind.") - Answer(text="Yes, please upgrade") Conclusion(text="Okay, you've been upgraded!") This representation works, but we can see that there’s some room for reuse in this conversation to reduce the size of the payload. To do this, we implemented a “goto” system and label some of our output. Consider below eg: Output(text="Hello, John! It looks like you booked a Basic Economy flight.") Output(text="Are you aware that this flight doesn't have any storage for carry-on luggage?") - Answer(text="No") Output(text="Some other limitations you may want to consider is that you will not be able to pick a seat.") Output(text="We're happy to let you know that we can upgrade you today for just $25!", label=1) Output(text="Would you like to do that now?") - Answer(text="Not right now") Conclusion(text="Okay, please let our customer service team know if you change your mind.") - Answer(text="Yes, please upgrade") Conclusion(text="Okay, you've been upgraded!") - Answer(text="Yes") Goto(label=1) In this example, the Goto(1) instruction would take the user straight to the existing subtree conversation, and Output has an optional second parameter to assign it a label. Outputs are the only thing that are a valid Goto target. It's another way of saying "continue the conversation from here". You're given the conversation tree and an array of answers that the user picked, and your task is to construct what the conversation between the user and Hopper was. Essentially, this means running through the conversation tree and printing out what Hopper said and what the User said, and what the conversation ended with. Below is eg of input: Hello, John! It looks like you booked a Basic Economy flight. Are you aware that this flight doesn't have any storage for carry-on luggage? -No Some other limitations you may want to consider is that you will not be able to pick a seat. 1:We're happy to let you know that we can upgrade you today for just $25! Would you like to do that now? -Not right now =Okay, please let our customer service team know if you change your mind. -Yes, please upgrade =Okay, you've been upgraded! -Yes >1 --- No Not right now Any number of Outputs may follow a single Output (but only at the same indentation level), and any of them may have labels that can be referred to from anywhere in the tree. An Output will always be followed by a series of Answers at the indentation of the Output + 1. An Answer can only be followed either by an Output (rules above still apply), a Conclusion, or a Goto. Goto and Conclusion cannot be followed by anything either at the same indentation level or the next one. After an Answer to an Output has been specified, no more Outputs are allowed at that indentation level. A Conclusion is meant to finish the conversation (all user answers after a Conclusion signal should be ignored).
      Responder pregunta
      11

      Otras opiniones sobre las entrevistas para el puesto de Software Engineer en Hopper

      Entrevista de Software Engineer

      13 nov 2022
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Oferta rechazada
      Experiencia positiva
      Entrevista difícil

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en Hopper

      Entrevista

      Full day of remote interviews, 4-5 sessions each with data structures programming. One behavioral round with hiring manager towards the end. Process started with a technical screen consisting of an online programming assessment.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      What would your former manager/colleagues say about you.
      Responder pregunta
      3

      Entrevista de Software Engineer

      3 oct 2022
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin oferta
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista normal

      Solicitud

      Envié una solicitud electrónica. Acudí a una entrevista en Hopper

      Entrevista

      The company seemed really pretentious with them trying so hard to emulate Amazon. Got rejected after a screening round which was an LLD round. Who screens on the basis of LLD though? The interviewer was not engaged throughout the process and was doing some of his own work. I had to say his name multiple times to bring him back to the conversation.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Conventional LLD problem was asked
      Responder pregunta
      3

      Entrevista de Software Engineer

      27 jun 2022
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin oferta
      Experiencia negativa

      Solicitud

      Acudí a una entrevista en Hopper

      Entrevista

      External recruiter reached out, and afterwards I chatted with a technical recruiter from Hopper. The written communication has been great, polite and timely. The initial chat was going fine until we started talking about the rest of the interview process. The recruiter explained to me that the next step was leetcode style and they used to give 2 days for the challenge to be completed but the women engineers complained that it was too short so they decided to make it a week. I got offended by this specification but still finished the interview as if I wasn’t. Did not continue the process afterwards.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      Which technologies I’ve worked with and my education background
      Responder pregunta
      3

      Las mejores empresas en cuanto a «Remuneración y beneficios» cerca de ti

      avatar
      Satguru Travels and Tour Serices
      3.5★Remuneración y beneficios