Found significant differences/inconsistencies between the job description and content discussed in the interview. No structure to questioning, often found it drifting over topics with no connection to the business infrastructure or type of tech that might be used. Instead it seemed to emphasize superior knowledge of interviewers themselves, and when challenged about relevance of topics I was advised the questions are tended purely out of curiosity, without having any direct application to the role. Also noted there would be a requirement for all roles to engage in "cross-working" with other "non-technical" departments, which would actually involve being moved to assist in the backlog of work for completely unrelated parts of the business - example supplied suggested being moved to the legal department to assist with proof reading of documentation (and as a developer I found this to be slightly odd). This is a practice adopted throughout the organisation and promoted as an opportunity to move outside comfort zones - but it did raise questions about boundaries of the role and responsibilities. Further received a technical challenge after the initial verbal interview, covered a range of software development questions.