Ir al contenidoIr al pie de página
  • Empleos
  • Empresas
  • Sueldos
  • Para empresas

      Impulsa tu carrera profesional

      Averigua cuánto podrías ganar, encuentra el empleo perfecto y comparte información sobre tu vida laboral y personal de forma anónima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Fanatics

      Empresa activa

      Información
      Opiniones
      Sueldos y beneficios
      Empleos
      Entrevistas
      Entrevistas
      Búsquedas relacionadas: Opiniones sobre Fanatics | Ofertas de empleos en Fanatics | Sueldos en Fanatics | Beneficios en Fanatics
      Entrevistas de FanaticsEntrevistas para el puesto de Platform Engineer en FanaticsEntrevista de Fanatics


      Glassdoor

      • Acerca de
      • Premios
      • Blog
      • Contacto

      Empresas

      • Cuenta gratuita de empresa
      • Centro de empresas

      Información

      • Ayuda
      • Normas
      • Condiciones de uso
      • Privacidad y opciones de anuncios
      • No vender ni compartir mi información
      • Herramienta de consentimiento de cookies

      Trabaja con nosotros

      • Anunciantes
      • Empleo
      Descargar aplicación

      • Buscar por:
      • Empresas
      • Empleos
      • Ubicaciones

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. «Glassdoor», «Worklife Pro», «Bowls» y sus logotipos son marcas comerciales registradas de Glassdoor LLC.

      Empresas seguidas

      Sigue a tus empresas favoritas para estar al tanto de las últimas oportunidades y disponer de información de primera mano.

      Búsquedas de empleo

      Recibe recomendaciones y actualizaciones personalizadas al iniciar tu búsqueda.

      Entrevista de Platform Engineer

      22 may 2026
      Candidato de entrevista anónimo
      Sin oferta
      Experiencia negativa
      Entrevista normal

      Solicitud

      Solicité el puesto a través de la recomendación de un empleado. Acudí a una entrevista en Fanatics en ene 2026

      Entrevista

      So everything about this process was actually very smooth and enjoyable until the final interview. First is a chat with the HM/director about yourself and the role. Fairly typical, talking about your resume your interests etc. Next round was technical, but not leetcode. It was essentially slowly building out a class to handle some behavior, and each next step was to handle more logic and continue fleshing out the logic. Also very enjoyable. Then there was actually a rather delightful behavioral interview, it’s fairly typical, but we wrapped up rather quickly and I had a nice chat with the interviewer and was given ample time to ask any question that I had. Now the final round was supposed to be a systems design loop, given that this wasn’t a pure SWE role, I got confirmation from the recruiter that it was mostly DevOps oriented—think CICD more or less. So with that knowledge I spent a good deal of time refreshing my knowledge, making sure I could talk about auto promotion strategies, why you would want to have a singular image to promote across environments etc. Now when the actual interview itself started, the interviewer himself quite literally stated that since he was higher up on “the food chain”, he can more or less just YOLO it especially since he thought the questions were “stupid”, his words not mine. So instead of it being a system design loop, it was a resume deep dive. Ok cool, not what I was expecting but sure? Well it turns out, the guy legitimately thought I was lying about myself. He thought I used ChatGPT because I had an awkward bullet point, which I wasn’t sure how to react to, because if anything, LLMs have a particular prose and style that is pretty much the opposite of awkward. He point blank did not believe that I did anything I had outlined on my resume and after roughly maybe 15 minutes or so he said “I’ve heard enough” and just decided to talk shop to kill some time and just ended it a bit later . Truth be told after I found out I was pretty bothered, but that’s how it goes sometimes.

      Preguntas de entrevista [1]

      Pregunta 1

      How do you handle vagueness
      Responder pregunta
      1