Initial phone contact by HR, followed by online coding assessment via HackerRank. This part was very simple. I then was contacted by the lead engineer who gave another technical phone screen, and was invited onsite for an interview. The on-site interview consisted of 4 persons for one hour each: 1 behavioral interview, two whiteboarding interviews, and one other non-whiteboarding technical interview. The whiteboarding exercises were of average difficulty. My negative experience is that not once during these interviews did the interviewers point out any specifics in the code that was being written - they were not engaged in a dialogue, they were observers. The single vague reason for my rejection was that they needed a person with more experience, but I couldn't even get an answer if that meant years of experience or if there were certain skills I could improve on. I was encouraged to apply for other jobs at the company, but without a fair evaluation of my strengths and weaknesses from these observers, this is a waste of time.