Interview process was fairly standard - recruiter call, tech screen, onsite. My only hang up was with the coding portion of the onsite interview - was given a coder pad and a problem to solve but told explicitly by the interviewer that this was a more "conversational" interview and that high level pseudo code that didn't need to compile would be sufficient. Later when I was given feedback I was told that there was not enough code in the coder pad for them to evaluate? Why tell me its a conversational interview if the amount of code in the coder pad mattered?

Ceo chat, tech screen, tech chat, onsite. Tech screen is half coding and half design Recruiting process was extremely uninformative and unprofessional but overall seems like a cool place to work (got really cult-y vibes though)