Kafka-esque, tortuously slow, and poorly planned/executed. I appreciate how transparent the org is with providing foresight into their interviewing process. However, I repeatedly had to harass HR to send meeting links or schedule interviews as promised. At times, HR had a terribly irksome habit of sending emails between midnight and 3AM, then responding to his own emails before 8AM. He also had an annoying habit of taking days to respond to routine requests. Even after I finished my third round interview with the VP, I had to harass HR multiple times over the course of 7 weeks to get status updates before ultimately being rejected. To be fair, HR did craft a personalized message to let me down gently, but I'm not sure that compensated me enough for the amount of time, flexibility and chasing around I had to do to essentially drive my own interview process. Fortunately, I dodged this bullet. My current employer has offered me a permanent role and has always made it apparent that they value their human capital as the crux of their operation. I was really, genuinely legitimately excited to work for such an amazing organization, but I just wish AARP was able to walk the same walk rather than just talking the talk like so many other non-profits in DC. Shameful.

Mine was a one on one interview. Basic Standard questions but the behavioral questions are tough. You need to have answers prepped and rehearsed. Managers and above will most likely be a panel interview. HR hands them questions to ask.

initial email, telephone call, follow up telephone call, in person with upper mngmt (three). All were fairly laid back. Questions were predictable. HR was friendly. Nothing out of the ordinary.