Great work culture/work life balance: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de QA Analyst/Associate QA Analyst en Infor

3,0
13 feb 2021
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Being my first company, had learnt lot about team work and co-ordination with colleagues here. Main positive here is a great management which provides value to employees by work life balance, leaves, insurances, events and annual gifts . This is such company where you can chill out by balancing work and then retire.

Desventajas

When I said it provides great values to employees by work life balance, it also does not encourage you to up your game in career ( not in my case or not sure if it was only in my team). There were no technical certifications that it provides or makes mandatory for employees career growth. Unfortunately since my join into company, the increments are worst you can say. I'm not sure if it was because of the covid or revenue drop or large hires.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Infor.

5,0
5 may 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Desventajas

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Respuesta de Infor
1mo
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3,0
22 may 2026
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Desventajas

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Respuesta de Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo