Stable company with management issues and outdated systems: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Senior Underwriter en Selective Insurance

3,0
14 may 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Long track record for stability, respected brand by retail agents and decent pay for employees with performance based bonus initiatives.

Desventajas

Many unfavorable changes at the Sr. Management level with key long term regional and home office people leaving for "retirement" or other career opportunities. Horrible rating and policy issuance systems; everything requires "work arounds". Company prefers to build its own systems and they are inefficient, outdated and make it hard to compete. The focus is on agent and not the employee. Management has a "let them eat cake" mentality; very elitist group.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Selective Insurance.

5,0
17 abr 2026
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Desventajas

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 may 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Desventajas

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

1
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo