Compensation is good; everything else is some good, some bad -- probably evens out.: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Empleado anónimo en Quantitative Risk Management

2,0
29 ene 2011
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

For developers, compensation and bonus is good. Talented people work here and keep up with latest technology. Stress level is low. Typically, you need to work only regular work hours (45 per week) and only on rare occasions need to work late hours and weekends.

Desventajas

Benefits (mainly health) are bad. Exact opposite of honest and open communication. Senior management is not strong. Even if 12 inches snow or you have a severe headache, you are expected to be in the office or take a time off; you cannot telecommute. Forget about being sent to external training.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Quantitative Risk Management.

5,0
21 mar 2023
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

- Dynamic and never-boring projects. - Mentally stimulating

Desventajas

- Most projects don't get implemented

2,0
19 ago 2010
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Compensation is lower than some financial firms in Chicago, but comparable or better than other firms with similar workloads. The work/life balance is quite good. Standard 45-hour week, and almost no pressure to put in more time. I never received resistence when asking to use my vacation time. On the technical side, QRM does make an effort to support using newer technologies. There are some very talented developers and technical managers here.

Desventajas

It's a pretty flat organization, but I was still very isolated from senior management. You receive pretty much 0 information about how well the company is performing. Draconian Internet access policy. Raises and bonuses are still around, but they are not nearly as impressive as a few years ago. Requirement to fill out time cards that add up for 45 hours a week (a bit weird for a non-billable salaried position). Lots of talent has left and QRM is slow to replace, if they replace at all. Relies almost exclusively on recruiters for new talent, which greatly limits the talent pool. The review process never puts you in contact with the people who actually decide your raise/bonus. On the technical side, QRM also has some technical managers who aren't keeping up with industry best practices. Many make decisions to get things done quickly, instead of getting things done correctly. Some of the developers are also pretty mediocre. QRM feels like a company on it's way down, and senior management seems to have no desire and/or ability to change anything to stem the bleeding.

3
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo