House of Cards. Leadership in Denial.: opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Empleado anónimo en Praescient Analytics

1,0
9 jun 2016
Empleado anónimo
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Many smart and capable employees.

Desventajas

- Praescient Analytics just suffered a devastating blow after its primary partner severed its business relationship. - Company is denying current employees access to their personal employee files and directing them to lawyers instead due to the severed partner relationship. - High Turnover: Company has three director level positions and has been through seven directors in less than a year. - CEO spends more than 60% of the year away from the office overseas. - A once 155+ person company is now below 40 employees and rapidly shrinking. - Executive leadership asked employees to write positive reviews on this site due to a series of bad reviews. Some reviews on this site seem like they were written by these executives. - Executive leadership is out of touch with reality. Shady accounting practices and rate manipulation will undoubtedly prevent any significant new government contracts from surviving official protests. - Company has generated little if any new business since Jan 2016 due to significant business development turnover and poor financial decisions.

avatar
Respuesta de Praescient Analytics
9y
Thank you for your feedback. We’re very sorry to hear that you feel this way, but we understand your frustration. Praescient did recently lose one of its oldest contracts. Unfortunately, this happens in the world of contracting as requirements and relationships change. At this point though, all of the employees who were on that contract have not been terminated and remain being supported by Praescient Analytics as we continue to be dedicated to our employees and their families with continued employment. I assure you that Praescient does not participate in any “Shady accounting practices” or “rate manipulation” and our financial practices are regularly audited by a third party CPA firm who controls all compliance regarding GAAP, DCAA, Rates, Bank Regulations as well as Monthly and Annual closings since the inception of the Company. We strive to make Praescient a great place to work, we encourage any employees who have questions or concerns about the current state of the company to take advantage of our Executive Team’s open door policy and reach out directly.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Praescient Analytics.

5,0
5 may 2023
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Company gave me autonomy to grow my skill sets. I've been included in meetings that in my last job I would have not been allowed to join. Very inclusive company. Friendly, fun and mature leadership.

Desventajas

Some of the remote employees caused some negative issues which caused some disruption.

3,0
2 oct 2017
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

Rigorous application process. Always felt like fellow employees were technically proficient, mission-focused, and motivated. The work itself was challenging and exciting. I always felt like I was adding value to the customer organization and was constantly given positive feed back. In the beginning the company was appropriately hands-off as far as micro-managing the analysts. You were able to work closely with more experienced members that stretched back to the first days of the company and its partnerships with the client. It was a true example of being mentored to greater amounts of technical proficiency and leadership responsibility and interactions with the customer.

Desventajas

The company had a written policy that they would cover the (reasonable) costs of technical training for personal and company skills enhancement. Numerous requests, my own as well as others, were accepted in paper form but never returned. They just seemingly disappeared down a rabbit hole. The company also had a tremendous amount of overhead positions that did not earn any money for the company. As more and more overhead was taken on over the months, it made analysts feel like they were cash cows for the company but little else. There was very little opportunity to transfer to other locations even when those positions became open. When forced to work overtime, the company would not pay any more money, even if you had to work on military timelines (12 hour days for one to two weeks at a time. A field exercise for example). Lastly, the company was transparent in the beginning, with various teams helping each other frequently. But over the months less and less flowed down until it seemed as though the company was purposefully not allowing communication between teams, and providing very little leadership.

3
Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo