The SE role here is structurally set up to fail (and leadership knows it): opiniones de empleados con el puesto de Security Engineer en Check Point Software Technologies

2,0
30 abr 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

The product portfolio is technically deep and the work itself can be engaging. Some individual managers do care and will try to advocate for you, but only within the limits of what the system actually allows them to do. That ceiling is lower than they'll admit in your interview.

Desventajas

The AE/SE pairing model is broken, and there is no functional escalation path when it goes wrong. I spent three years split between two partnerships: one where I was actively undermined, scapegoated in front of customers, and effectively muzzled from communicating directly with prospects near quarter-end—and a second where I carried the full strategic and technical load for an AM who openly described himself as "not an IT guy" in customer meetings and never developed the fluency the role requires. In both cases, I raised concerns. In both cases, nothing structurally changed. The compensation model is inequitable by design. SEs run 80/20 salary-to-commission. AMs run 50/50. But when attainment is shared, SEs absorb identical downside with a fraction of the upside. Across three years I received zero raises—not one—while the cost of living climbed steadily. I was passed over for RSUs in years where my AM, carrying the same attainment number, received them. My final performance review contained auto-generated language threatening my job. My AM's did not. Same number. Different consequences. No one ever explained why, because there is no good explanation. Leadership stood on a CPX stage and invited "brutal honesty"—displayed the CEO's email on the screen and told us to use it. I did. The response I got wasn't from the CEO. It was from a middle manager telling me to filter feedback through hierarchy before it reaches the top. That's not a feedback culture. That's the performance of one. If you are an SE considering this role: go in with eyes open. You may be evaluated on a number you don't control, penalized for outcomes driven by a partner you didn't choose, and find that the internal systems designed to protect you are mostly decorative.

Echa un vistazo a otras opiniones sobre Check Point Software Technologies.

5,0
25 ene 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

It was fun to work there a lot of good experiences.

Desventajas

No cons i can tell

1,0
30 may 2026
Recomendar
Aprobación del CEO
Perspectiva de la empresa

Ventajas

The core responsibilities offer solid experience, and many team members are dedicated, talented, and great to work with.

Desventajas

Lack of HR Support: The company lacks a safe, objective framework for employee feedback. When legitimate management issues were raised to HR, no corrective action was taken. Instead, it resulted in direct retaliation from leadership, which was left unaddressed by the organization. Significant Under-Market Pay: Compensation is well below industry standards for similar scopes of work. To give context, transitioning into a comparable role at a different company yielded a 37% increase in base pay. Flawed & Inaccurate Sales Compensation: The commission and incentive structures for the sales organization are unnecessarily convoluted. This complexity frequently leads to errors in commission payouts, causing widespread frustration among sellers. Notably, these calculation mistakes are consistently detrimental to the employee and rarely seem to resolve in the seller's favor. Siloed "HQ-Centric" Culture: There is a heavy disconnect between corporate headquarters and regional teams. The culture feels highly insular, creating an "in-group" dynamic where those outside of headquarters have very limited visibility, influence, or opportunities for career progression.

Ver opiniones por: Útil|Valoración|Fecha|Todo