Pretty normal design interview process. It was very similar process to Facebook if you've gone through that loop as well. I think they have a lot of ex-facebook designers and recruiters. I was contacted by recruiter (who was awesome and helpful) and had a screen with the recruiter within a few days. Very simple recruiter screen: told me what the team was looking for, what the team's makeup was, and I discussed briefly about myself. Got feedback fairly quickly (1 day) and moved onto Round 1 (past works 45 minute video conference). Video conference you need to present 1-2 projects by screen sharing via google hangouts. Recruiter helped a lot and sent a lot of information before the presentation. I was mislead a tad. Recruiter sent me an email saying "Don't spend more than 5 minutes to talk about the process. We can ask more about this if we need to dig deeper." This confused me since interaction design is all about the process. I asked a designer friend who said their team is changing their hiring to be similar (more results focused instead of process focused). So I took this to heart and mainly presented the final work and talking about why I made certain decisions. This was wrong. When I mentioned skipping the process to get to the final shipped product one of the reviewers muttered "well that's the most important part" under his breath. Since this was a keynote presentation it was hard to unskip it and show the nitty gritty process pieces. I think there might be a disconnect between what recruiter thinks they're looking for and what the design team is actually looking for. It's very possible the recruiter just sees what doesn't work (UX designers with too much process/weak visuals) so trust your gut. I didn't make it past this step (feedback within a day) but it was very helpful in refining my presentation for future interviews. Feedback was an email & not a call which was fine.