Had to do the design exercise twice, both times the brief said it's "open to interpretation". Turns out it wasn't open to my interpretation but to theirs. Both times the screeners were fishing for reasons to reject the project. Very subjective. Very questionable.

Basically the interview is split into 5 rounds. The first one is just to check your communication skills. I had the interview and the interviewer was so nice, it went all fine. Next was to send a portfolio with best 5 projects. I did that and they asked me if I want to continue to the next step which was a screen sharing interview to showcase my workflow. This is the painpoint: Their interviewers "designers" seem to not know the difference between a polished product and unfinished product. I showed both polished interefaces, and unfinished ones. The reason I was rejected is that the interviewer didn't like how I presented my work, and cit ' I want to see your workflow and not just the finished product' . And I just did that, but then later on he told me to show a completed project. The reason I got rejected was that I had : Corners of the rectangles are not the same. You interrupt me, and do not ask me questions. ( Am I the interviewer or you are, and when I am asked to showcase my workflow, YOU SHOULD LISTEN not me. ) That was the horrible experience ever. I worked for huge Swiss agencies and never had these problems when pitching. The thing I will just try again, just for curiosity, because we all understand that 3% marketing campaign. And I analyzed their TOP designers work, and to be honest it was nowhere near to be impressive.